Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Critical Perspectives on User Involvement$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Marian Barnes and Phil Cotterell

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9781847427519

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847427519.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM POLICY PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.policypress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Policy Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PPSO for personal use.date: 18 October 2021

Collaboration in public services: can service users and staff participate together?

Collaboration in public services: can service users and staff participate together?

(p.79) Six Collaboration in public services: can service users and staff participate together?
Critical Perspectives on User Involvement

Michelle Farr

Policy Press

This chapter analyses collaborative forms of participation that involve both users and front-line staff in the process of creating public service improvements and innovations. Often called co-production, co-design or co-creation, these participative mechanisms are designed to promote and value the experience, skills and knowledge of users, developing partnerships between service users and public service staff to redesign and produce services that promote dignity, welfare and well-being. The analysis investigates how and why these processes might prompt changes, the management practices needed to support these mechanisms, the influence of contextual conditions, power relations and the impact of collaboration. This is achieved using a realist synthesis of co-production, co-design and co-creation cases and expert interviews with facilitators and managers who have been involved in such projects. The chapter draws on research conducted within local government and health service settings. It concludes that whilst co-production does not have the same independence and political character of autonomous action by service users and is thus not able to address broader human rights issues, it can be an effective means of achieving change within organisational boundaries.

Keywords:   co-production, co-design, partnership, institutional context

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.