This concluding chapter revisits the main arguments for rejecting the transformation thesis and reconsidering governance from Marxist and Gramscian perspectives, and highlights the point that characterising institutions as ‘hierarchies’ or ‘networks’ is misleading. The Gramscian conception of ‘governance as hegemony’ is one response to the call for challenges to an orthodoxy now deservedly falling into disrepute. Its purpose is to encourage research and activism that contemplates governance from the standpoint of resistance and transformation. Beyond the celebration of networks and the denunciation of hierarchies, exploring how the dialectic plays out would be a worthwhile research challenge, and perhaps the basis for new and better classifications.
Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.