This chapter continues the argument that the asylum and dispersal systems create legislative and policy-imposed liminality. It observes that asylum seekers resist this liminality and different forms of belonging emerge that do not reflect official policy mechanisms designed to ‘integrate’ refugees, and run counter to the government's social and community cohesion agenda. It uses a theoretical continuum between liminality and belonging to show how there are ongoing and simultaneous processes of policy-imposed liminality and resistance to this imposed sense of liminality as a result of the design of dispersal and other asylum policies. It argues that the trajectory of asylum policy in the UK has increased the chances of liminality and mistrust being experienced. It concludes by bringing together the theoretical, empirical, and conceptual concepts of the preceding chapters.
Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.