Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Making spaces for community development$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Pitchford

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9781847422590

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847422590.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM POLICY PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.policypress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Policy Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PPSO for personal use.date: 14 October 2019

A seat at the table? The changing context for community development

A seat at the table? The changing context for community development

(p.17) Three A seat at the table? The changing context for community development
Making spaces for community development

Michael Pitchford

Paul Henderson

Policy Press

When New Labour came to power in 1997, its commitment was to build strong communities. In their third term, they talked of putting power and resources in the hands of the ‘law-abiding majority’. During this period, there were more resources than ever for community-level activities and communities were positioned to have a central role in decision making within their neighbourhoods. It was a time characterised by the devolution from central government to local government and from local government to citizens and communities. It is also a period marked by the increasing engagement of citizens, which is becoming a statutory duty, and it is also a period marked by the need to involve those who are ‘hard-to-reach’. This chapter discusses some of the key shifts in terms of the landscape of community development. In particular, it looks at the change from a confrontational approach to the model of partnership working which predominates in all areas of regeneration and urban renewal. Today, participation in the partnerships has brought with it a greater recognition of the potential role of community development in achieving policy objectives. Thus the community development workforce has grown substantially. Practitioners are now required to be more accountable for how they carry out their roles, although their accountability is upwards to the funders or authorities rather than to the communities in questions.

Keywords:   New Labour, decision making, local government, engagement, key shifts, confrontational approach, partnership working, regeneration, urban renewal

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.