The activation dilemma: a comparative study
The activation dilemma: a comparative study
This chapter provides the methodological framework for the comparative study that is used to validate the hypothesis mentioned in the previous chapter. Following a brief description of the cases under analysis, the chapter then demonstrates that the relation between the employment effectiveness of minimum income schemes and their respect for the right to personal development can be best analysed by combining simple correlational tools, cluster analysis, and the heuristic potential of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA).
Keywords: employment effectiveness, minimum income, right, personal development, correlational tools, cluster analysis, qualitative comparative analysis
Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
