Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Death of Affirmative Action?Racialized Framing and the Fight Against Racial Preference in College Admissions$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

J. Scott Carter and Cameron Lippard

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9781529201116

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: September 2020

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781529201116.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM POLICY PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.policypress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Policy Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PPSO for personal use.date: 21 September 2021

Case Study 1: The Gratz and Grutter Supreme Court Cases against the University of Michigan

Case Study 1: The Gratz and Grutter Supreme Court Cases against the University of Michigan

Chapter:
(p.115) 5 Case Study 1: The Gratz and Grutter Supreme Court Cases against the University of Michigan
Source:
The Death of Affirmative Action?
Author(s):

J. Scott Carter

Cameron D. Lippard

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781529201116.003.0005

The purpose of this chapter is to understand arguments put forth by these social authorities (individuals and groups) in support and opposition to affirmative action within a prominent debate on affirmative action in higher education admissions. We are particularly interested in advocacy groups that have the ability and resources not afforded to most individuals to lobby the Supreme Court. We used the Gratz v. Bollinger et al. and Grutter v. Bollinger et al. U.S. Supreme Court cases as the site of the first case study. We look at how these entities deployed specific arguments and rhetoric within court documents to frame affirmative action to Supreme Court Justices. In particular, while all frames were considered, we look at two discursive frames prominent in the literature and how they were used by supporters and opponents of the policy: color-blind and threat frames. Findings demonstrate that while supporters often used color-blind arguments (and some threat as well), the opponent briefs were saturated with both color-blind frames.

Keywords:   Gratz v. Bollinger et al, Grutter v. Bollinger et al, Color-blind Racism, Abstract Liberalism, Group Threat, Group Positioning

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.