Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Imagining Regulation DifferentlyCo-creating for Engagement$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Morag McDermont, Tim Cole, Janet Newman, and Angela Piccini

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9781447348016

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: September 2020

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447348016.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM POLICY PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.policypress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Policy Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PPSO for personal use.date: 06 July 2022

The role of community anchor organisations in regulating for engagement in a devolved government setting

The role of community anchor organisations in regulating for engagement in a devolved government setting

Chapter:
(p.167) 9 The role of community anchor organisations in regulating for engagement in a devolved government setting
Source:
Imagining Regulation Differently
Author(s):

Eva Elliott

Sue Cohen

David Frayne

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447348016.003.0010

This chapter considers the role of community anchor organisations in the ‘flagship’ regeneration programme of the National Assembly for Wales, ‘Communities First’, launched in 2001 and later terminated in March 2018. It unpicks the story of the programme's evolution and demise from the perspectives of community development advisors and community development practitioners, the latter based in two community organisations in South Wales: South Riverside Community Development Centre (SRCDC) in Cardiff and 3Gs Community Development Trust in Merthyr Tydfil. Both organisations were involved in the Productive Margins programme and in the design and analysis of this research. Both pre-existed the Communities First programme and were charged with its delivery to local people. The chapter thus looks at the regulatory context in which these organisations found themselves and how they negotiated the demands of the state-funded programme, on the one hand, and their accountabilities to the communities that they believed they represented, on the other. A key question remains as to whether the involvement of community organisations in state-funded programmes can facilitate regulation for engagement for social change or whether their power to improve the well-being of the communities they represent might better be served in providing alternative modes of living.

Keywords:   Community First, community anchor organisations, South Riverside Community Development Centre, 3Gs Community Development Trust, regulatory context, state-funded programmes, social change, regeneration programme

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.