Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Social Policy Review 29Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2017$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John Hudson, Catherine Needham, and Elke Heins

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9781447336211

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447336211.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM POLICY PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.policypress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Policy Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PPSO for personal use.date: 25 June 2022

Beyond ‘evidence-based policy’ in a ‘post-truth’ world: the role of ideas in public health policy

Beyond ‘evidence-based policy’ in a ‘post-truth’ world: the role of ideas in public health policy

Chapter:
(p.151) Eight Beyond ‘evidence-based policy’ in a ‘post-truth’ world: the role of ideas in public health policy
Source:
Social Policy Review 29
Author(s):

Katherine E. Smith

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447336211.003.0008

This chapter discusses the role of ideas in policy making. The existence of conflicts between evidence-based and ideological approaches to politically contentious issues is widely recognised. However, for policy issues — such as public health — in which there seems to be rather more of a consensus about the overarching objectives, it seems less obvious how or why ‘politics’ might obstruct the use of evidence within policy making. Indeed, the majority of civil servants and politicians in a post-1997 UK context have signed up to taking an evidence-based approach to improving population health and reducing health inequalities. The existence of such a cross-sector consensus suggests that public heath might be one area in which evidence-based policy and practice are feasible. Yet, disappointingly, most assessments of public health policies continue to conclude that they are not evidence-based. A popular explanation for this disjuncture is that it results from communicative, institutional, and cultural gaps between researchers and policy makers.

Keywords:   policy making, evidence-based policy, public health, evidence-based approach, population health, health inequalities, public health policies, researchers, policy makers

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.