Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Policy Analysis in Canada$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Laurent Dobuzinskis and Michael Howlett

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9781447334910

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: January 2019

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447334910.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM POLICY PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.policypress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Policy Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PPSO for personal use.date: 28 July 2021

The “lumpiness” thesis revisited: the venues of policy work and the distribution of analytical techniques in Canada

The “lumpiness” thesis revisited: the venues of policy work and the distribution of analytical techniques in Canada

Chapter:
(p.49) Three The “lumpiness” thesis revisited: the venues of policy work and the distribution of analytical techniques in Canada
Source:
Policy Analysis in Canada
Author(s):

Michael Howlett

Seck Tan

Adam Wellstead

Andrea Migone

Bryan Evans

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447334910.003.0003

This chapter contributes to the understanding of analytical practices and tools employed by policy analysts involved in policy formulation and appraisal by examining data drawn from 15 surveys of federal, provincial and territorial government policy analysts in Canada conducted in 2009-2010, two surveys of NGO analysts conducted in 2010-2011 and two surveys of external policy consultants conducted in 2012-2013. Data from these surveys allows the exploration of several facets of the use of analytical tools, ranging from more precise description of the frequency of use of specific kinds of tools and techniques in government to their distribution between permanent government officials and external policy analysts. As the chapter shows, the frequency of use of major types of analytical techniques used in policy formulation is not the same between the three types of actors and also varies within government by Department and issue type. Nevertheless some general patterns in the use of policy appraisal tools in government can be discerned, with all groups employing process- related tools more frequently than ‘substantive’ tools related to the technical analysis of policy proposals.

Keywords:   lumpiness thesis, federal policy analysis, provincial policy analysis, policy consultants, NGO analysts, analytical techniques

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.