Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Australian public policyProgressive ideas in the neo-liberal ascendency$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Chris Miller and Lionel Orchard

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9781447312673

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447312673.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM POLICY PRESS SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.policypress.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Policy Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in PPSO for personal use.date: 02 April 2020

Natural resource management: steering not rowing against the current in the Murray-Darling Basin

Natural resource management: steering not rowing against the current in the Murray-Darling Basin

Chapter:
(p.263) Fifteen Natural resource management: steering not rowing against the current in the Murray-Darling Basin
Source:
Australian public policy
Author(s):

Daniel Connell

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447312673.003.0015

Recent water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin has been strongly influenced by neo-liberal principles. Introduced in the 1990s the water market allowed irrigators to reduce the potential impact of a severe drought in the 2000s. It also made it possible for governments to purchase large volumes of water to slow the decline in resource security and the riverine environment, albeit through large payments for water entitlements handed out near free of cost earlier in the twentieth century. But the strength of neo-liberal perspectives among policy makers and the public is making it increasingly difficult to argue for programs that promote sustainability and resilience in anticipation of climate change when they conflict with profitability. Neoliberal purchaser-provider arrangements are also at the core of the Commonwealth Water Act 2007. It gives the national government control of high-level policy and states will be rewarded financially for implementing plans developed within its framework. This chapter predicts, however, that the distinction between purchaser and provider will collapse in the event of serious tension between the national government and the states because national government members of parliament are unlikely to allow serious financial penalties to be inflicted on voters in their state based electorates.

Keywords:   Murray-Darling Basin, Water Act 2007, water markets, purchaser-provider, climate change

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.