What value do consequences have to promote in order to be considered good? How is that value to be measured? Consequentialism states that what makes an action good or bad depends on the effects that action engenders. In response to these questions, the most famous school of consequentialism — utilitarianism — arises. This chapter reviews three criticisms of consequentialism. First is the ‘consequentialist dilemma’ with which utilitarians have spent much time wrestling. Second is the issue that consequentialism arguably leans towards ‘agent-neutrality’. Third is the objection that consequentialism does not respect the separateness of people. The chapter ends with a discussion on consequentialism and its relevance for, and approach to, applied ethics.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.