Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Making spaces for community development$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Pitchford

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9781847422590

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847422590.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Who is it for? Accountability and community development

Who is it for? Accountability and community development

(p.75) Six Who is it for? Accountability and community development
Making spaces for community development

Michael Pitchford

Paul Henderson

Policy Press

The community development has been and continues to be influenced by the increased accountability required of practitioners and the community development field as a whole. Debate and discussion on the need for evidence is now an important ingredient in community development conference. This chapter examines how the issues of evaluation, evidence and accountability were addressed in the past through the experiences of practitioners. It also looks at how these issues have impacted community development practice and relationships between practitioners and communities. Upward accountability has increased considerably as a part of the government's overall approach to driving up standards in public services. The resulting focus on programme outputs and targets is distorting practice away from empowerment and social change activity towards a greater emphasis on service delivery. The process of community development has also come under increasing pressure as the emphasis on short-term outputs does not easily fit with sustained, long-term nature of community development. Among the questions addressed in this chapter are: how have these changes influenced the ability of practitioners to develop trusting relationships with the communities they work in, and within the new policy context of neighbourhood decision making, what opportunities exist for practitioners and communities to work together to exert greater influence and control within the setting of local priorities?

Keywords:   accountability, evaluation, evidence, trusting relationships, community development practice, service delivery, targets, outputs

Policy Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.