Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mental health service users in researchCritical sociological perspectives$

Patsy Staddon

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9781447307334

Published to Policy Press Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447307334.001.0001

Show Summary Details

(p.175) Appendix: Details of the seminar series

(p.175) Appendix: Details of the seminar series

Source:
Mental health service users in research
Publisher:
Policy Press

Researching in mental health: sociological and service user/survivor perspectives: a joint seminar series between the Survivor Researcher Network and the British Sociological Association Sociology of Mental Health Study Group

Organised by: Lydia Lewis, Angela Sweeney, Ruth Sayers and David Armes

Edited version of the report presented to the Foundation for the Sociology of Health and Illness, July 2009

The aim of this seminar series was to bridge the gap between academic sociologists of mental health and service user/survivor mental health researchers, providing opportunities for learning from one another. In this respect, it was groundbreaking and was an extremely worthwhile and successful initiative, as evidenced by the feedback reported later. In fact, the aim was more than met, with each event attracting an average of around 40 attendees spread across different organisational backgrounds, including survivor/service user organisations, academia and mental health practice. The seminars provided for attendance from all over the UK, including Scotland, and internationally, with one presenter travelling from Germany and delegates attending from France and Ireland.

Five seminars took place in total (the February seminar was cancelled due to bad weather) between January and June 2009. They were hosted free of charge at the British Library in London on the first Monday of each month, from 6pm to 8pm, and all were extremely well attended. The series began with a panel session to get debate going and then featured between two and three presentations at each, with a combination of survivor/service user and sociological (p.176) presentations on each occasion (see programme, outlined later). This made for lively debate and stimulating discussion at each event. This continued informally on each occasion in order to maximise benefits for participants, including networking opportunities, and opportunities to bridge divides between delegates working in different sectors and to encourage collaborative links. This aspect of the series was particularly successful, as the feedback reported later demonstrates.

In addition to oral presentations and discussion, the seminar series encompassed the display of work from two survivor organisations: the Survivor History Group and Recovery. This element of the series was well appreciated and added additional opportunities for dissemination and interest for delegates.

Presentations from the seminar series will be archived on the British Sociological Association Sociology of Mental Health Study Group website (available at: www.britsoc.co.uk/medsoc/MedSocMentalHealth.aspx), while possibilities for publication of papers presented during the series will be explored. An online forum has been set up in response to demand from delegates and, in light of its success and the many benefits it accrued for those involved, some of the organisers and other participants are keen to run a second seminar series. Acknowledging the extremely worthwhile nature of the initiative, the British Sociological Association has offered to support such future events, which contribute towards its ‘public sociology’ agenda.

In the remainder of this report, we present the programme of the seminar series, followed by some of the feedback from delegates. We would like to thank the Foundation for the Sociology of Health and Illness for supporting the initiative, and also the British Library for their support in providing the venue and funding a wine reception on the closing evening. Thanks as well to the British Sociological Association for doing such an excellent job in providing administrative support and publicity materials.

(p.177) Programme

12 January 2009

Panel session ‘Mental health research by and with service-users/survivors: opportunities and barriers’. Chair: Professor Peter Beresford, Centre for Citizen Participation, Brunel University. Speakers: Professor George Szmukler, Dr Diana Rose, Patricia Chambers, Dr Julie Ridley.

2 March 2009

‘What's in a name? Race, user involvement and “hard to reach” communities’, Jayasree Kalathil, Survivor Research.

‘Effective involvement in mental health services: the role of assertive outreach and the voluntary sector’, Rosie Davies, Bristol Mind.

‘Politics of recognition: what can a human rights perspective contribute to understanding users' experiences of involvement in mental health services?’, Lydia Lewis, Department of Sociology, University of Warwick.

6 April 2009

‘In-sight-bi-polar self-management’, Heather Straughan, Centre for Mental Health Recovery, University of Hertfordshire.

‘Not ending with the research report: extending the outcomes into the researched reality’, Jasna Russo and Sandra Hamilton, Berlin, Germany.

‘Does who we are make a difference to the research that we do? Evaluating the impact of service user involvement in mental health research’, Steve Gillard and Kati Turner, Division of Mental Health, St. George's, University of London.

11 May 2009

‘How personality became treatable’, Martyn Pickersgill, Institute for Science and Society, University of Nottingham.

‘Women, alcohol and mental health: achieving authenticity in a hostile environment’, Patsy Staddon, University of Plymouth.

1 June 2009

‘A symbolic interactionist approach to mental health outreach’, Jim Roe and Hugh Middleton, University of Nottingham.

‘Using personal experiences to understand other people's mental health recovery’, S. Ajayi, J. Billsborough, T. Bowyer, P. Brown, A. Faulkner, A. Hicks, J. Larsen, P. Mailey, R. Sayers and R. Smith, Rethink.

Discussion of the seminar series and ways forward.

(p.178) Participant comments

What did you enjoy most about these seminars?

“The opportunity to listen to and discuss presentations of service user and survivor research alongside more directly sociological mental health presentations – also equally the opportunity to get to know the BSA [British Sociological Association] study group members and SRN [Survivor Research Network] community better after the seminars.”

“Opportunity to network; finding out about other people's work.”

“Fresh approaches and perspectives – quite different from the presentations I am mostly used to.”

“Hearing about innovative projects and ideas; networking.”

“Being able to listen to other user researchers' research topics/interests and the networking opportunities during these seminars.”

“The papers were short, but very good and there was plenty of time for open discussion, which was very engaging.”

“It allowed user and professional researchers to learn from each other.”

“The friendly exchange of ideas – ideas about the sociological relevance of user research (useful, as I teach sociology).”

“Opportunity to hear and network with assorted people and disciplines and original thinkers.”

“The opportunity to be up to date on the research being conducted and the difficulties encountered. The convivial nature of the interaction, particularly in the later seminars.”

“Spirited mix of different kinds of perspectives, discourses and debates.”

(p.179) “The opportunity to hear from people working on challenging the status quo with new and fresh ideas, and examples of their work.”

“Really, really, really interesting and informative. At the informal bit in the pub later, I had some excellent in-depth discussions that were as enlightening as the seminars.”

“Stimulating mix of people. Perspectives that were challenging.”

Further comments and suggestions for future events

“It would be good to have more seminars of this nature as they seem to bridge the gap between service users and mental health workers. Debate on these important issues could really move us forward.”

“I think it would be a good idea to continue pairing SRN researchers with BSA Study Group researchers on themed seminars.”

“It's important that a sociological focus is retained … [to ensure] challenges to conventional thinking.”

“I thought the idea of further developing a relationship between user groups and the BSA is both timely and full of potential for future activities.”

“I would definitely be up for attending future seminars. Thanks for organising them!”

(p.180)